Passing the b*ck

With Northern Germany’s annual attempt at winter being upon us again (dark, drizzly, not really cold, definitely not snowy), my thoughts at this time of year always turn not to Christmas (which to this Canadian requires snow), but to how the chain of responsibility inevitably seems to be tied to the ankle of the average citizen.

By pixel2013 (https://pixnio.com/nature-landscapes/leaf-leaves/texture-road-pavement-autumn-yellow-leaf-concrete-outdoor)

There’s any number of things that is oh so wrong with these signs …

For starters, when does land paid for and largely used by the public suddenly become private property? And why do I have to clear my truly private property that perhaps no one except the mail carrier has to use? Can you imagine the outcry (and fines) if I dared put up a similar sign? I readily admit that both the University and especially the City have a lot more property to clear, but then they also have much better equipment than my neighbour—some schmo with a leaf blower at 6:30 AM—to do it.

And speaking of signs …

At a park not far from my house, the city has put up a sign stating that you need to pick up after your dog or risk a fine of 50 EUR. (Or, as was pointed out so helpfully, about the same cost as 2500 poop bags, thereby giving poop bags about the same buying power as the Dominican Peso, the Ethiopian Birr, the Macedonian Denar, or the Mauritius Rupee, among others.) And, just so you get the message, the exact same sign is repeated no less than five times every five meters or so. But, strangely enough, despite the universality of the warning and fine, the sign is not present in any other park in Not-Bielefeld that I’ve been too, suggesting that the job order to “just put up these six signs” was given at the very end of someone’s working day.

Another park, however, does proactively go the extra 1.6 km by occasionally supplying free poop bags for you to pick up after your dog. No signs (probably because of the nonsensical conversion rate from Euros to poop bags in this case), just the bags. Oh and a massive guilt trip, with each bag saying in no less than five different ways that using them will help to protect the environment.

As always, I get it. No one likes to step in dog shit, not even dogs. But actively promoting that encasing a biodegradable product in plastic to spend the rest of eternity in an anoxic landfill is more environmentally friendly than simply leaving it in an ecological setting? Makes you wonder how the Earth ever survived long enough until humans came along to save it. Sort of adds an extra justification to shooting wolves too. Not only are they eating all our livestock, but they’re also destroying nature when all the inedible bits of the cows and sheep come out the other end. C’mon! There’s more crap on the outside of the bag than could ever fit inside it.

By Shinyju (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Manhattan_(84943548).jpg)

Instead, what’s really missing from this whole discussion is garbage cans. Tell me to pick up after my dog? Fine. But at least give me somewhere to throw the bag away. I don’t have any real data to back this up other than me sometimes carrying dog poop around for half an hour or more, but I strongly suspect that there are more public mailboxes in Not-Bielefeld than there are public trash cans. And those few trash cans that do exist are usually overflowing with poop bags even though they are located along the main roads or exactly those places you tend to avoid when you go walking with your dog.

(And putting the poop bags into someone’s private garbage can is completely out of the question. Germans are insanely protective of their garbage cans. As in stupidly insanely protective. For example, at our housing unit, I once asked whether we could combine our 11 individual garbage cans into one big one for the entire unit. They looked at me as if I was as insane in general as they were about their bins in particular. Not only would each of us not have our own garbage can anymore, but the single large garbage can, despite being as inconveniently located in the back of the complex like the 11 smaller ones, would simply serve as an open invitation for others to deposit their trash in it as well.)

And speaking of overflowing rubbish …

Even the University has gotten into the swing of things. Some years ago, they replaced the aging, outdoor garbage cans at our campus with sets of shiny new ones all colour-coded for the different flavours of trash that exist today (plastics, organics, paper, and, well, garbage). Fast-forward to today where now only a single outdoor set remains, presumably because the University discovered that convenience costs money and more garbage cans means more costs in emptying them. As an added bonus, the single set was often overflowing as a result, which provided helpful examples of which trash went where for those who couldn’t remember the colour combinations.

And speaking of cost-cutting …

As a result of the war in the Ukraine shutting down natural-gas supplies from Russia to Europe, many German municipalities put emergency energy plans in place so that our natural-gas reserves would hopefully hold out for the entire winter. (Part of these plans apparently being instituted years ago in the form of global warming so as to make this past winter one of the warmest ever on record so far.) One of the more cutting-edge initiatives included in many plans was to turn off the hot water for the showers at public swimming pools and sport clubs.

From  https://hairfreezingcontest.com

Problem is that this solution doesn’t do so much for saving energy as it does for saving the municipalities money. Let’s face it, no one really uses public showers because they enjoy the feeling of lukewarm water dribbling onto them. Instead it’s much more of a case of trying to wash all the chlorine (read urine) or sweat off of you before changing back into clean clothes. Turning off the taps doesn’t make all those excretory products suddenly disappear. It merely forces everyone to shower at home on their own dime, which suddenly buys a lot less hot water than it used to.

To top it off, much of the hue and cry about the energy crisis seems to have been completely overblown. BloombergNEF estimates that Europe’s natural-gas reserves in combination with reduced demand are normally sufficient to endure the coldest winter Europe has faced in the past 30 years, not the increasingly warmer ones that we are actually having. In fact, the reserves in Europe were so full in late October of last year, that the price of natural gas actually dropped below zero for some time. Naturally these lower costs were passed automatically on to the end consumer just like they were early on in the pandemic when the price of oil also went negative.

So, as it turns out, the buck always seems to get passed down to the average citizen, but the bucks always seem to flow the other way …

Excusez moi?

Ever wonder why so many semi-official signs on cars and trucks, at least in Europe, are in French? Ok. Not really that many, but still. CD (corps diplomatique) for embassy cars, convoi exceptionnel or the misspélled vehicule long for long vehicles, and, most recently, the rather macabre angles mort for vehicles with a large blind spot. But, if you ask me, that’s still an awful lot.

By Lothar Spurzem (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Citroën_2_CV_Charleston_(2015-08-29_3174_b).jpg)

Instead, Germany comes to mind much more often when it comes to cars (as well as useless admin signs) as does the United States, especially with their penchant, both past and present, for building convoi exceptionnel. And you can throw Italy and many others into the mix as well.

Left by Matti Blume (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Red_Ford_F-350.jpg); right by anoldent (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1959-Cadillac-4d-HT.jpg)

But France? Mon dieu!

Oh Canada …

But even the fully vaccinated aren’t automatically in the clear because there is still random, mandatory testing. Those winning this lottery get informed about it by e-mail within fifteen minutes after clearing customs and have to complete the testing by the end of the next day.

Now, although I’ve been firmly on the side of caution, if not overcautiously caution, throughout the pandemic, the implementation of this whole random testing system is oh-so wrong in oh-so-many ways …

  1. It’s unnecessarily complicated (even for admin)

pexels-kampus-production-8949869

The simplest solution would be to be informed of the random testing while you’re still in customs, especially given that everyone has to fill in their declaration on a computer terminal anyway. Then they can whisk away those lucky few for a free (nasal) cavity search and get some actual, initial results within those 15 minutes using a rapid antigen test. If they turn out to be positive, then they can put you in quarantine while they PCR you on top of that to be sure.

But instead …

The whole thing is outsourced to several private companies. The best you can do at the airport is to pick up one of their home test kits. Or, if you miss the e-mail (which we did because we simply didn’t think about it having already been awake for about 17 hours, stupidly jet-lagged, and just plain eager to get the hell outa there), you could pick up your kit later at a designated provider or have it delivered to you by courier. After having first chosen the latter, more convenient option, we soon discovered that the delivery time was a mere two to three days—or one to two days after the end of the next day by which we had to take the test.

Success Goals Analysis Corporate Business Concept

So after picking up the test instead—in no small part because of the incessant e-mails informing us of our continuing non-compliance with our mandatory testing—we had to make an appointment with the private company so that one of their employees could watch us take the test over video. Then, under the same watchful eye of the same watchful employee, we had to seal up the vial, put it back in the test box, seal up the test box, put it in a courier bag, seal up the courier bag, and, for reasons still completely unknown to us, sterilize the entire outside of said bag with the provided miniature alcohol swab. Once all that was done, we still had to arrange for the courier to pick up the bag to whisk it away to the labs of the company three provinces over.

Waaaaaaay simpler, right?

  1. It takes too long

pocketwatch

Although we got our results back in only four days, it could take up to two weeks to get your result depending on the delivery and analysis times. Or, in other words, if you had been positive when you landed, you won’t be anymore when you find out that you are.

Even worse: because you weren’t officially positive for those four days to two weeks, you didn’t have to enter quarantine and could still use public transportation. Or, in other words, happily and unknowingly officially infecting a whole bunch of Canadians whom these measures are designed to protect.

  1. It costs too much

All this nonsense is provided free of charge, probably about the only good thing about it if you’re not a Canadian taxpayer. That includes all the tests, all the staff watching you impale your skull with a Q-tip via video, all the toll-free time spent on hold trying to figure out what’s going on, and all the courier shipping costs.

Remember my all-in-one airport solution? Not only is it much simpler, but it’s probably also much cheaper. But then, isn’t having your tax dollars supporting private companies the essence of a free-market economy these days?

  1. It’s running now?!

Ol’ Sleepy Joe might be jumping the gun a little (but with the midterms around the corner, the truth always takes a bit of a breather), but the pandemic is certainly waning at the moment. It certainly wasn’t waning the last time we visited Canada in March when exactly none of this was implemented.

BCD 15.09.2022

Another mercifully slow summer as admin seems to be serially estivating until the autumn. However, there is always the watchful eye of the Office of Dataprotection and Informationsafetymanagement here at the University of Not-Bielefeld, ready to leap selflessly into the void …

… only to fill it with a vacuum.

Their latest missive warns us about a particularly cunningly crafted phishing attempt going around currently that looks like this:

Let me know if you are free right now.

Thanks

No joke. That’s the e-mail. Except for spoofing the return address, the phishers have made little effort beyond that to disguise it. They haven’t even gone through the trouble of setting up a fake website to gather your data, phishing attempts that I regularly get bombarded with but never warned about. Instead, after you reply to the e-mail, we’re warned that they tell you that they are short of money and need you to purchase any of a number of online gift cards and send them the codes.

Do we really need to be warned about this? I mean, let’s take a look at the chain of brain farts required here to get reeled in:

  1. Failing to recognize the e-mail as a phishing attempt, despite it being anonymous, in English from a predominantly German-language university, and, sigh, containing that gaudy banner indicating that it is not even from your predominantly German-language university;
  2. replying to it;
  3. accepting the fact that online gift cards are the usual way of helping “friends” out of a financial tight spot;
  4. purchasing said gift cards; and
  5. replying again to send the codes on to the phishers.

In this day and age and at this Institute of Higher Learning, if the alarm bells aren’t ringing at (1) and absolutely deafening at (3), then I don’t know how an e-mail warning us about the scam can possibly do any good either.

But then maybe admin just needs to reassure us every once in a while that they’re still there and working hard for us …

BCD 01.09.2022

The latest bonehead comment of the day comes to you from Ryanair, with whom I flew with a couple times in the past few weeks.

For those fortunate few not familiar with Ryanair, it’s basically an infomercial at 30.000 feet. The tickets tend to be dirt cheap, but then you have to pay for everything on top of that: seat reservations, priority boarding access, extra baggage, and, once you’re up in the air, food, duty-free items, and lottery tickets. (Yes, lottery tickets in the form of scratch cards. And, like the duty-free items, they’re usually introduced using the word “amazing”.) At one point, there were even musings about charging to go to the toilet during the flight. Ryanair has been doing this for years and are now the model most other airlines are gravitating to by charging for stuff that used to be included in the price.

In any case …

A recent, pandemic induced change is that you could now only pay for the inflight unnecessities by card and not cash “because of COVID-19 restrictions”. We’ll ignore the fact that it has long been known that corona is unlikely to spread through surface transmission or that cards and the stuff you’re buying also have surfaces. What makes this explanation particularly boneheaded is that it was thoughtfully provided to us by a flight attendant who was not wearing a mask, who had earlier informed us that our wearing of a mask was only recommended but not mandatory, and who worked for an airline that no longer checked our vaccination status before boarding.

Breathe all you want, but God forbid that you ask me to carry change …

Return to sender

I learned a new word in German the other day …

By Day Translations Team (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Useful_German_Travel_Phrases_Word_Cloud.png)

In and of itself, that’s probably not too surprising. After all, I’ve only been learning German for about half my life and, like any language, there are lots of words to learn. Even when you get past the swear words. And, depending on who you ask, German has a lot of words to learn: 15 000 in the average person’s active vocabulary, 135 000 in the official German dictionary, and a whopping 5.3 million in total (or 8x the total number of English words).

What is surprising, however, is that most Germans I asked didn’t know the meaning of the word either. The word? Entsendung. Translated into English, it means deployment or posting.

From https://freesvg.org/vector-image-of-sad-penguin (And I know it's not a duck.)

This immediately struck me as strange because the German prefix ent- is often used to negate the rest of the word. As in enthaaren (to remove hair from something), or entfrosten (to defrost), or even Ente (duck). Admittedly it does get tricky sometimes. Entgelt can mean either fee or reward (depending on which side of the transaction you’re on, I guess) and enthalten can be used to either abstain from something or that something is included (other than your participation presumably). And German does have entfallen, which among its several meanings can colloquially mean the same thing as fallen (to drop something). (So not quite the English flammable and inflammable, which both mean the exact same thing formally, but getting there.) In any case, Entsendung, linguistically speaking, should really be the act of not sending (deploying, posting, …) someone or, more charitably (again, at least in a linguistic sense), bringing someone back to the Fatherland.

But, it does indeed mean sending and not returning and translated into another English word I never knew existed until now, it means secondment. So, what prompted this sudden bit of bilingual illumination on my part? Admin, of course, and, even worse, European admin.

Since the middle of 2019, the A1 certificate (or “Statement of applicable legislation”) has come into force across Europe to indicate the European state an individual pays their social-security payments to. It’s supposed to be a safeguard for employees who work in foreign countries and especially those who have been temporarily posted in those countries by their employer so they only make the payments once. And said workers need to carry this certificate around with them or face some heavy-duty fines of up to 10 000 EUR if they get caught in some sting operation.

So what does this all have to do with me? Well, quite literally, it should be nothing really, but reality has its own opinions.

In filling out the application recently for a business trip on behalf of the University of Not-Bielefeld (which sounds a lot better than just going to a scientific meeting), there was this “new” requirement: for all international business trips within Europe, an accompanying application for an Entsendebescheinigung (i.e., the A1 certificate) also had to be filled out. (Now, I say “new”, but, as I said, the legislation has been around since mid-2019 and, somewhat embarrassingly, the statement about secondment requirement has also been on the form since about the same time. I just hadn’t noticed it until now. And I would have continued happily not noticing it except that one of my doctoral students questioned me about it for her own application for the same conference. Shows you how well I read through forms. Or, given that I have ignored it until now, how well the crosstalk between the admin-types here at the university is. Or how well I teach my students to ignore all the admin fine print.)

Admittedly, the university admin is largely just playing along with the decrees of their European idols. Nevertheless, the entire implementation of all this has all the hallmarks of really great admin.

  1. It’s impractical

Getting an Entsendebescheinigung requires not one, but two levels of admin: the University of Not-Bielefeld, which makes the formal application as my employer and German Social Services, which officially issues it. If you thought that one level of admin was slow, a second one must make everything exponentially slower. So forget any spur of the moment meetings with colleagues outside the country unless those spurs are about two months long.

(Unfortunately, I wrote that before having applied for my first Entsendebescheinigung at the university. It is true. In theory. But the University of Not-Bielefeld has struck some sort of deal with German Social Services so that they can take care of the whole thing internally. In the end, the entire process took less time (a stunning two days) than for me to get over my shock. To paraphrase Thomas Henry Huxley: the great tragedy of Sarcasm—the slaying of a beautiful story by an ugly fact )

A1certificate

Be that as it may, worse yet is that the Entsendebescheinigung is country-specific. If you visit (sorry, work in) more than one country on the same trip, you need a certificate for each country.

And, to top it all off, it isn’t a certificate at all but a five-page document (for each country) that, according to the rules, I need to keep with me at all times. Right …

  1. It’s pointless

I’m not being “deployed” or “posted” anywhere. Hence my initial confusion about the word Entsendung (once that I knew what it actually meant). Even secondment means that your superiors are sending you somewhere else. And, as much as my superiors would probably like to do just that sometimes, that isn’t the case here. I’m just going to a conference. On my own free will. And partly on my own dime or at least definitely not on the dime of the conference.

  1. It’s not even an Entsendebescheinigung

Yup. Entsendebescheinigung is merely the 21-letter “colloquialism” for the official term, which, as the official website for the German pension plan stiffly informs us, is the 60-character catastrophe Bescheinigung über die anzuwendenden Rechtsvorschriften (A1). Uh huh. I’ll stick with Entsendebescheinigung. (My suggestion: colloquialize it even more by replacing Bescheinigung with the even shorter BS. Or at least change the word Entsende, which is phonetically and analogously way too close to entsetzt (horror).)

Modified from original by Armin Linnartz (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Angela_Merkel,_Juli_2010.jpg)

Nevertheless the Entsendebescheinigung is here to stay and mandatory. All of which makes me wonder if Angela Merkel had to apply for the damn things as well for each and every European trip she made since 2019 in her role as the German Chancellor. (And, yes, I know that Olaf Scholz is the current Chancellor, not Angela Merkel. But most people, and especially those outside of Germany, would probably just say “Who?”)

Worse yet, the same would presumably also be true of all German soldiers (and, in fact, any European soldiers) that are stationed outside of their home country. Can you imagine the paperwork? And, more importantly, how long that paperwork will take to process before they can go and shoot someone? Think about it. So long as some unnamed foreign leader doesn’t announce the planned invasion of a European country many months in advance, the rest of Europe cannot legally send troops to help defend that country. (Especially if that country is France or Austria, both of which seem to be real sticklers when it comes to the A1 certificate. Sorry guys.) Forget the fact that the A1 certificate could double up as some pretty effective additional body armour with its five pages. If the foreign soldiers can’t produce it during a battle to indicate which pension fund they might not be collecting from in the future, then they could be barred from the “company premises”.

In any case, my plan for the future is to simply claim that I’m in the country on holiday. (Hopefully you don’t need an Entsendebescheinigung for that now too.) And if I choose to meet with colleagues while I’m on holiday, so be it. Lots of Germans, especially those from the Rhineland, also purposely head to the North Sea for their holidays, something which I personally find to be a lot more inexplicable.

Masking disappointment

Has anyone else noticed this?

Although the corona pandemic actually remains in full swing (and, thanks to omicron, swinging higher in terms of numbers than ever before), most countries including Germany are quickly shedding most of their corona-related restrictions. For instance, the train station here in Not-Bielfeld recently removed the signs indicating which side of the stairs one should use. (Fair enough. Like anyone ever paid attention to those.) Even the University here has caught the bug. Despite Not-Bielefeld currently being close to the top 10 in terms of infection rates in the country, the University just dropped its 3G requirement as well as that for FFP2 masks. Same virus as a week ago, but apparently suddenly less dangerous today so that a second-rate mask will do.

As a result, masks nationwide are happily being tossed aside as well to reveal some long sought after full-frontal (facial) nudity.

Now, in the case of most of my undergrad students, these are people that I only know with masks on. Some hair, two eyes, and a pair of sore ears were pretty much the only facial landmarks of theirs that I had to go by. From the nose on down was a complete mystery and my imagination had to fill in all the details. And now where the mystery has been revealed, my imagination turns out to have been very imaginative. And usually dead wrong.

By Piotr Siedlecki (https://www.publicdomainpictures.net/en/view-image.php?image=206469&picture=my-face)

And for some strange reason, the truth, more often than not, came across to me as more disappointing than my imagination. It’s not so much that the truth was different, but more so that I somehow expected it to be better and also to fit better to that little bit that I could see from before.

I have absolutely no idea what this all means. The simplest explanation is that I’m a jerk and is one that I’m not ready to cast aside. It could also be that my (our collective?) concept of beauty tends to focus on the eyes. At least from the neck skywards. You often hear how eyes are beautiful or the gateway to the soul. Noses? They’re much more often the gateway to snot, especially when they don’t happen to have a rapid antigen test currently shoved up them. Definitely not sexy. Mouths are problematic though because there are such things as dazzling or beguiling smiles. Like I said, I just don’t know.

By www.deviantart.com/marcusburns1977/art/The-Phantom-of-the-Opera-re-draw-830181522 (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Phantom_of_the_Opera_Mask.jpg)

What I do know, however, is that if my experience is true for most people, then the singles dating scene must’ve taken an awful hit over the past two years. Instead of waking up and thinking “Oh my God. What did I bring home last night?”, that thought probably didn’t make it to the morning after that often and instead was transferred to last night right after the masks came off …

BCD 13.06.2022

Like most Canadians, I’ve long wondered why the US has stubbornly refused to adopt the metric system. (Which is apparently a myth: they have, but they just don’t use it. So, like Canada, except that we use it a lot more even if not always all of the time.) In a society obsessed with convenience, you think that they’d have long moved on from a system that includes all numbers except 10 as possible conversion factors.

So a recent CNN article about this topic caught my attention.

There were, of course, the usual slew of explanations: Americans hate change (except when they have to buy the latest model of whatever (car, TV, cellphone, partner, …) with all the new features or move house for the fourth time in the past three years) or to stand up against “international tyranny” (especially on the part of France, whose only noteworthy achievement on the world stage since 1815 was getting the points in the Eurovision Song Contest to also be announced in French).

But it’s the last paragraph of the article that’s really telling:

“If I were to describe what makes America America, it’s oftentimes our cludgy workarounds that actually sometimes are less disruptive and allow us to function and tolerate the many different ways of doing things within a single country. And that’s not a minor achievement, actually, on some level, if you think about it. And it’s embedded in our political system, with 50 state governments operating simultaneously with a single national government. And perhaps on some level, it’s embedded in (sic) well in our very ugly but functional system of measurement.”

Stephen Mihm, University of Georgia

Ignore the details (e.g., 50 states or the measurement system) and this American history professor has basically described the way virtually every nation and any federalist government system on Earth functions as being uniquely American.

Or, to adopt the phrase used somewhat earlier in the article, another failed attempt at “American exceptionalism”.

Map of countries of the world still primarily using the Imperial system of measurement. Made with mapchart.net

Killing time

It gets worse …

At a recent meeting of the profs in my department, it was revealed to us that, on average, we engage in about 30% more teaching than we officially have to do. This, of course, was seen as problematic, but not for the reason that most sensible people would logically come to. The real problem, it seems, is not that we’re overworked, but rather that we’re giving the impression by offering so much teaching that we have too much time on our hands, which could lead to job cuts in the future.

By JustineP38 (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Elaboration-dun-programme-personnalise-de-reussite-educative-ppre-pour-aider-les-eleves-des-ecoles-et-colleges-a-surmonter-leurs-difficultes-dapprentissage.jpg)

I just don’t understand the maths on this one. Overtime normally means too much work for too few people. Getting rid of even more people would mean even more overtime. Which, by their logic, would mean more cuts and more overtime until only one poor sod is left to work a 40-hour day. And weekends …

So what to do? We could do less teaching, of course, but this would mean cutting into our Bachelor and Master teaching programmes (which combined are already shorter than their North American equivalents, another gripe of mine). Instead, the solution was mindblowingly straightforward: if the University of Not-Bielefeld is not going to give us any gold stars for doing more than our share of teaching then we’ll only claim the amount that we ought to be doing. Yep, that’s right. We reinvented the concept of overtime to not only make it unpaid, but invisible as well.

Once again, the maths elude me …

By James Cridland (https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crowd_%28613445810%29.jpg)
By PourquoiPas (https://pixabay.com/de/photos/frau-verärgert-fall-teleskop-975339/)

On top of that, there’s going to be a 30% disconnect in the number of teaching hours that we offer and the amount that we actually do. Forget invisible overtime. Now we’re also making normal time vanish out of existence! Would be a really neat trick, but some eagle-eyed, number-crunching admin type is going to notice the fabric of space-time slowly unravelling eventually. And hell hath no fury like an admin type when the sums of two columns don’t add up.

So …

So much for perpetual motion machines being impossible …

BCD 09.05.2022

Part of the University of Not-Bielefeld’s justification in opening up fully for teaching this semester was that the incidence of corona among students earlier this year was far lower than in Not Bielefeld generally, meaning that the University was neither a corona hotspot nor a spreader event. And, as part of its meticulously thought out programme to ensure that this continues to be the case, the University no longer requires corona-infected students to register this particular status.

To adapt the phrase minimally popularized by Mark Twain: “Lies, damn lies, and admin …”.